Estate Proceeds Trusts: A Case Study

by Jacqui Brauman

In this example, Sara’s husband Tim has died in an accident. They have two primary school aged children, Michael and Melissa. Tim and Sara had prepared Wills a few years prior, when the children were still very young. They were basic Wills, which simply ensured that everything went to each other in the case that either of them passed away, and if they both passed away, then their estate would be divided between their children.

Piggy-BankSara and Tim own a house with a mortgage – they owned this jointly, so that the house automatically transfers to the survivor. They have a car each and superannuation. Tim owns a portfolio of shares. Sara works as a teacher, and Tim had a job in corporate finance. Tim also had a life insurance policy of $500,000.

Tim’s estate comprises of his share portfolio, the proceeds from his life insurance policy, a payout from his employee entitlements, and his car. His superannuation is paid directly to Sara, and doesn’t form part of his estate. The house doesn’t form part of the estate, either, as it automatically transfers to Sara as the surviving joint owner. All their other bank accounts were joint account, so they also don’t form part of the estate, and are automatically transferred to Sara as the surviving joint account holder. Sara uses the superannuation to pay the mortgage, and has enough left over to invest some for her future. Tim’s estate is worth approximately $650,000.

Sara has a couple of options. She could just inherit the estate in accordance with the wishes in Tim’s Will. Alternatively, because she doesn’t really need the money from the estate, she could set up estate proceeds trusts for Michael and Melissa, so that their future gets a kick start.

An estate proceeds trust can be set up a beneficiary under a Will, for a minor who didn’t inherit under the Will, but who would have been entitled to inherit if the person had died without a Will (intestate).

If Tim had died intestate, then Michael and Melissa would have each been entitled to about $183,000 each under Victorian law (check the intestacy laws in your State).

Sara transfers $183,000 into an estate proceeds trust for each Michael and Melissa. Under the terms of the trust, they would normally inherit when they were 18 years old, but Sara extends this until they are 25 years old. She invests each sum, and earns about $10,000 per year income from the investment. This income is distributed to Michael and Melissa, for Sara to make use of for their education and other expenses. This income is tax free, because Michael and Melissa are taxed as adults (at marginal rates) on income from the estate proceeds trust (unlike a usual family trust, under which minors are taxed at penalty rates), and they are under the tax-free threshold. So effective, Sara has given herself $20,000 of extra income per year, tax free, which she can use for the children.

If Sara had kept the inheritance herself and invested it, she would be paying tax on the interest income that it earned. But because she chose to set up estate proceeds trusts for her minor children, she is advancing her children’s future and also getting a substantial tax saving.

If you happen to be in such a horrible situation as to lose your spouse whilst your children are young, if is worthwhile taking some time to grieve before deciding how the estate is to be dealt with. You do have 3 years from the date of death of your spouse in which to set up estate proceeds trusts for your children, so don’t act too rashly and take your time to plan what is best for you and your children.

Contact us to arrange a chat. It doesn’t hurt to ask.

2015-11-20T20:45:34+00:00